Book reports, term papers, essays !...Help is here !!!

THE FOLLOWING REPORTS ARE ALL AVAILABLE FOR YOU TO DOWNLOAD TODAY! All subjects are only $9.95/pg regardless of difficulty level! Bibliography pages are FREE! MAKE YOUR SELECTION BELOW:

Skeet Shooting & Pollution
[ send me this report ]
This 9 page paper focuses on a legal case concerning The Long Island Soundkeeper Fund and The New York Coastal Fishermen's Association v. The New York Athletic Club. The case addressed environmental issues and was under the Clean Water Act umbrella. Bibliography lists 7 sources.
Filename: Skeet.wps

“Benjamin v. Lindner Aviation, Inc.”
[ send me this report ]
This 5 page paper examines the Iowa Appellate Court case “Benjamin v. Lindner Aviation, Inc., a 1995 ruling that turns on the definition of found property. Bibliography lists 1 source.
Filename: HVBenLin.rtf

1971 Montreal Convention: A Legal Brief
[ send me this report ]
A 2 page paper which presents a legal brief of the case concerning the 1971 Montreal Convention. No additional sources cited.
Filename: RAlbmontr.wps

Aaron B. Cooley v. Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia
[ send me this report ]
A 6 page brief of Aaron B. Cooley v. Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia, to the Use of the Society for the Relief of Distressed Pilots, Their Widows and Children, Defendants.; Same V. Same; Supreme Court of the United States, 53 U.S. 299; 1851 U.S. LEXIS 658; 13 L. Ed. 996; 12 HOW 299; December, 1851. The plaintiff charged that Pennsylvania usurped federal powers in requiring payment for the use of a pilot into and out of the port of Philadelphia. The majority disagreed, holding that every state had a right to regulate its own ports. Justices McLean and Daniel dissented in that pilots remained on board after leaving the jurisdiction of the state and entering federal waters. No sources listed.
Filename: KScooleyVward.wps

Agency and Employee Accountability in Cases of Negligence: The Legal Issues of Employee Credibility and Training
[ send me this report ]
An 8 page assertion that our educational arena has been subject to many challenges and disappointments. At the center of many of these is the issues of employee credibility and training. That the educational system has a problem is not an issue of contention. What is questionable in the current day legal environment, however, is whether or not employees and school districts can be held legally liable for the educational inadequacies which result from inadequate teacher qualifications and training. This paper utilizes the Supreme Court cases of Monroe Vs Pape (1961), Monell Vs Dept of Social Services (1978), City Of Oklahoma Vs Tuttle (1984), Daniels Vs Willaims (1986), Davidson Vs Cannon (1986), and City of Springfield Vs Kibbe (1987) to add insight to that question. All illustrate the delicate balance between employee liability and negligence on the part of the agency when employee credibility is challenged. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Filename: PPcivRt2.rtf

Albert's Beach Find
[ send me this report ]
A 5 page paper discussing the likely outcome of a court's decision should a found property case find its way there. The situation is discussed in light of only the guidance provided in Benjamin v. Lindner Aviation, Inc., Iowa SC, 534 N.W.2d 400 (1995). Bibliography lists 1 source.
Filename: KSlawBchSilv.rtf

ALUMINA AND THE ENVIRONMENT: A LEGAL CASE STUDY
[ send me this report ]
This 6-page paper discusses legal options and principles that Alumina Inc. needs to determine in regards to a potential lawsuit. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Filename: MTalumlega.rtf

An Appeal to the Utah Court of Appeals: Antibigamy Laws
[ send me this report ]
A 10 page appellate brief. Loosely formatted in accordance with Utah's requirements for appellate briefs, this paper argues the Constitutionality of Utah's antibigamy laws from the perspective of the First and the Fourteenth Amendments. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Filename: PPlwBgmy.rtf

An Example Brief and Appellate Decision
[ send me this report ]
This 11 page paper provides an overview of a brief and an appellate decision in two different cases. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Filename: MHAppellOp.rtf

An Outline for an Appeal to the House of Lords
[ send me this report ]
This 6 page paper looks at the way in which a case that has failed at the court of appeal may be argued for consideration by the House of Lords. The case considered is that of Chapman & Another v CPS Computer Group PLC (1987) which concerns the breach of an employment contract and a share option agreement on the transfer of the company and employment contract to a third party. The paper argues for the defendant (the employers) by way of frustration, a concept which was not argued ion the original case. The bibliography cites 10 sources.
Filename: TEappeal.wps

Analyzing Three Cases According To Michael A. Berch's "Introduction To Legal Method And Process
[ send me this report ]
7 pages in length. The writer discusses Rush v. Maple Heights, Hess v. Pawloski and Mitchell v. Rochester Railway Co. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Filename: TLCBerch.rtf

Antitrust Law: History and Cases:
[ send me this report ]
This 7 page paper discusses Antitrust Law from several perspectives. History of Antitrust Law is discussed as is regulatory authorities, current legislation and historic cases. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Filename: GSAntitr.rtf

Appellate Brief
[ send me this report ]
9 pages in length. Jake Grabel moved in with his ex-wife, Betsy, while he was still married to his second wife, Laverne. Soon the relationship between Jake and Betsy soured, and Jake decided to go back to live with Laverne. In the interim, Betsy sold many of Jake's belongings, claiming that she is entitled to half of the property he acquired during the two years of time she and Jake were living together. Jake sued for the return of the property, which consisted of a 1987 Jaguar, 3 compact disc players, a diamond ring, a hot tub and a snowmobile. Jake lost the trial court action. The following appellate brief was submitted shortly thereafter. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Filename: TLCApBrf.rtf

Appellate Brief for Case Study
[ send me this report ]
This 6 page paper is a sample appellate brief based on a New York case study submitted by a student. The case involves a search and seizure by police after an individual is stopped for speeding. The brief argues that the search was illegal based on the fourth amendment. Five notations are included in Bluebook style. No bibliography .
Filename: SA350app.rtf

Appellate Brief for Case Study (Wrongful Birth)
[ send me this report ]
This 10 page paper is a sample appellate brief based on a fictitious California case study. The case involves a wrongful birth claim involving a woman who gave birth to a Down Syndrome child. Notations are included in Bluebook style. No bibliography .
Filename: SA442app.rtf

Appellate Brief Pennsylvania
[ send me this report ]
A 5 page paper providing an appellate brief according to the laws of Pennsylvania. Clients’ child has been denied access to public education because she is HIV-positive. The brief suggests that appeal first focus on whether Ginger’s right to medical information privacy under Pennsylvania law has been violated, then continue to the requirements of IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act), which state that every public school district must provide free public education to all of those requesting it. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Filename: KSlawHIVbrief.rtf

Bourjaily v. United States (Brief)
[ send me this report ]
This 3 page paper evaluates a case regarding the hearsay rule and exceptions in this Supreme Court case. The case involves a drug transaction. The sixth amendment is referenced in the context of the case. No additional sources cited.
Filename: SA408One.rtf

BOWERS V HARDWICK, 1986 -- LEGAL BRIEF ANALYSIS
[ send me this report ]
This 3-page paper analyses the case of Bowers v Hardwick, regarding the constitutionality of the Georgia sodomy law during the mid-1980s.
Filename: MTbowhar.rtf

Brief for Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975)
[ send me this report ]
A 2 page summary of this Supreme Court case, in which several students brought a class action suit against a Southern Ohio school board for suspending them from school without hearing either before or after the fact. The students' argument is that they were denied the due process afforded by the Fourteenth Amendment, and wanted all reference to their suspensions removed from their permanent records. The Supreme Court agreed with the students, but qualified their decision as not meaning that formal hearings need to be held for more minor suspensions. Bibliography lists 1 source.
Filename: KSGossVLopez.wps

Enter your topic: